古脊椎动物学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (4): 308-324.DOI: 10.19615/j.cnki.1000-3118.190725
收稿日期:
2019-05-31
出版日期:
2019-10-20
发布日期:
2019-10-20
通讯作者:
*zhangyingqi@ivpp.ac.cn基金资助:
ZHENG Shao-Hua1,2, ZHANG Ying-Qi1,2,3,*(), CUI Ning1,2
Received:
2019-05-31
Published:
2019-10-20
Online:
2019-10-20
摘要:
泥河湾盆地因产出丰富的哺乳动物化石及众多的旧石器地点而久负盛名。为弄清盆地地层的年代范围,近年开展了包括生物地层学、磁性地层学、沉积学、地球化学、孢粉学等多学科的综合研究。目前主要分歧在于对泥河湾层的年代学认识,表现在生物地层学与磁性地层学研究结果不一致。新种化石材料即是从甄选的典型剖面中采集的。䶄亚科和鼢鼠亚科由于演化趋势明显并且容易量化、演化速率快,对晚新生代生物地层学的研究具有十分突出的意义。鉴于此,对产自泥河湾盆地的䶄亚科三个新种(泥河湾模鼠Mimomys nihewanensis sp. nov.、简齿松田鼠Pitymys simplicidens sp. nov.、前中华波尔索地鼠Borsodia prechinensis sp. nov.)及鼢鼠亚科两个新种(稻地上新鼢鼠Pliosiphneus daodiensis sp. nov.、铺路上新鼢鼠P. puluensis sp. nov.)进行了简要记述,以期对泥河湾盆地生物地层学框架的建立有所帮助,并从生物进化的角度为泥河湾层的年代学认识提供新证据。
中图分类号:
郑绍华, 张颖奇, 崔宁. 记泥河湾盆地晚上新世—早更新世䶄亚科(Arvicolinae)和鼢鼠亚科(Myospalacinae)五新种. 古脊椎动物学报, 2019, 57(4): 308-324.
ZHENG Shao-Hua, ZHANG Ying-Qi, CUI Ning. Five new species of Arvicolinae and Myospalacinae from the Late Pliocene-Early Pleistocene of Nihewan Basin. Vertebrata Palasiatica, 2019, 57(4): 308-324.
Fig. 1 Selected molars of Mimomys nihewanensis sp. nov. from Hougou section near Qijiazhuang village, Yangyuan County, Hebei Province A-A2. right m1 (IVPP V 23157.9, holotype), B-B2. right m2 (V 23157.25), C-C2. right m3 (V 23157.32), D-D2. left M1 (V 23157.38), E-E2. left M2 (V 23157.61), F-F2. left M3 (V 23157.76);A-F. occlusal view, A1-F1. buccal view, A2-F2. lingual view
Fig. 2 Selected molars of Mimomys nihewanensis sp. nov. from Laowogou section near Daodi village, Yangyuan County, Hebei Province A-A2. right m1 (IVPP V 23160.2), B-B2. right m2 (V 23160.16), C-C2. right m3 (V 23160.24),D-D2. left M1 (V 23160.28), E-E2. left M2 (V 23160.36), F-F2. left M3 (V 23160.50); A-F. occlusal view,A1-F1. buccal view, A2-F2. lingual view
Species | average width (mm)|rate of closedness (%)2) | min.|mean|max., n | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | Is 1 | Is 2 | Is 3 | Is 4 | Is 5 | Is 6 | Is 7 | SDQ | ||
Borsodia chinensis | 26 | 0.04|100 | 0.05|81.0 | 0.04|100 | 0.05|100 | 0.21|0 | 0.22|0 | 0.41|0 | 53|67|85, 21 | |
B. prechinensis sp. nov. | 1 | 0.07|100 | 0.08|100 | 0.07|100 | 0.07|100 | 0.17|0 | 0.29|0 | na | 91|91|91, 1 | |
B. mengensis | 5 | 0.05|100 | 0.10|80.0 | 0.07|100 | 0.07|80.0 | 0.25|0 | 0.31|0 | 0.40|0 | 101|115|122, 5 | |
Mimomys nihewanensis sp. nov. | 58|55 | 0.06|92.5 | 0.15|0 | 0.09|61.7 | 0.08|63.6 | 0.36|0 | 0.47|0 | na | 112|138|168, 43 | |
M. orientalis | 41|19 | 0.06|100 | 0.13|26.3 | 0.10|47.4 | 0.07|94.7 | 0.30|0 | 0.41|5.3 | 0.45|0 | 113|132|157, 21 | |
Pitymys simplicidens sp. nov. | 1 | 0.03|100 | 0.03|100 | 0.03|100 | 0.03|100 | 0.16|0 | 0.08|100 | 0.22|0 | 62|62|62, 1 |
Table 1 Average width and rate of closedness of isthmuses and SDQ on m1 of related arvicoline species1) from China
Species | average width (mm)|rate of closedness (%)2) | min.|mean|max., n | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | Is 1 | Is 2 | Is 3 | Is 4 | Is 5 | Is 6 | Is 7 | SDQ | ||
Borsodia chinensis | 26 | 0.04|100 | 0.05|81.0 | 0.04|100 | 0.05|100 | 0.21|0 | 0.22|0 | 0.41|0 | 53|67|85, 21 | |
B. prechinensis sp. nov. | 1 | 0.07|100 | 0.08|100 | 0.07|100 | 0.07|100 | 0.17|0 | 0.29|0 | na | 91|91|91, 1 | |
B. mengensis | 5 | 0.05|100 | 0.10|80.0 | 0.07|100 | 0.07|80.0 | 0.25|0 | 0.31|0 | 0.40|0 | 101|115|122, 5 | |
Mimomys nihewanensis sp. nov. | 58|55 | 0.06|92.5 | 0.15|0 | 0.09|61.7 | 0.08|63.6 | 0.36|0 | 0.47|0 | na | 112|138|168, 43 | |
M. orientalis | 41|19 | 0.06|100 | 0.13|26.3 | 0.10|47.4 | 0.07|94.7 | 0.30|0 | 0.41|5.3 | 0.45|0 | 113|132|157, 21 | |
Pitymys simplicidens sp. nov. | 1 | 0.03|100 | 0.03|100 | 0.03|100 | 0.03|100 | 0.16|0 | 0.08|100 | 0.22|0 | 62|62|62, 1 |
Species | m1 | m2 | m3 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L | E | Ea | Eb | HH-Index | L | HH-Index | L | HH-Index | |||
M. banchiaonicus | 3.90|3.90|3.90, 1 | na|>3.76|na, 1 | |||||||||
M. bilikeensis | 2.26|2.46|2.66, 30 | 0.32|0.70|1.00, 31 | 0.24|0.50|0.76, 31 | 0.08|0.19|0.36, 31 | -0.08|0.10|0.25, 31 | 1.60|1.71|1.84, 16 | -0.04|0.10|0.22, 16 | 1.28|1.44|1.60, 10 | -0.09|-0.16|-0.20, 10 | ||
M. gansunicus | 2.59|2.74|2.92, 15 | na|>3.33|na, 1 | na|>3.20|na, 1 | na>3.17|na,1 | na|>5.18|na, 1 | ||||||
M. orientalis (Gaotege) | 2.44|2.87|3.20, 14 | 2.00|2.52|2.84, 5 | 1.84|2.45|2.72, 5 | 0.96|1.27|1.48, 14 | 0.97|1.27|1.52, 14 | 1.60|1.73|1.92, 12 | 0.75|0.97|1.32, 12 | 1.44|1.53|1.56, 7 | 0.32|0.43|0.54, 7 | ||
M. orientalis (Danangou) | 2.60|2.73|2.88, 26 | 1.00|2.05|2.48, 15 | 1.40|1.87|2.28, 15 | 0.80|1.01|1.24, 15 | 0.78|1.16|1.63, 26 | 1.68|1.78|1.88, 17 | 0.72|0.94|1.40, 17 | 1.40|1.55|1.72, 12 | 0.12|0.37|0.57, 12 | ||
M. orientalis (combined) | 2.44|2.78|3.20, 40 | 1.00|2.17|2.84, 20 | 1.40|2.02|2.72, 20 | 0.80|1.14|1.48, 29 | 0.78|1.20|1.63, 40 | 1.60|1.76|1.92, 29 | 0.72|0.95|1.40, 29 | 1.40|1.54|1.72, 19 | 0.12|0.39|0.57, 19 | ||
M. nihewanensis sp. nov. | 2.44|2.80|3.12, 51 | 1.32|1.81|2.40, 23 | 1.16|1.63|2.20, 23 | 0.08|0.78|1.40, 54 | 0.56|0.81|1.16, 51 | 1.52|1.82|2.12, 61 | 0.14|0.67|1.22, 61 | 1.24|1.58|1.76, 38 | 0.07|0.27|0.57, 38 | ||
M. peii | 3.47|3.64|4.01, 7 | na|>5.30|na,1 | 4.0|4.32|4.63, 2 | 2.25|2.25|2.25, 2 | na|>6.51|na, 2 | ||||||
M. teilhardi | 2.17|2.55|2.85, 102 | 0.40|0.99|1.64, 60 | 0.28|0.92|1.64, 60 | 0.14|0.49|1.12, 60 | 0.20|0.46|1.00, 62 | 1.52|1.71|1.88, 62 | 0.20|0.40|0.65, 62 | 1.28|1.43|1.56, 39 | 0.00|0.12|0.31, 39 | ||
M. youhenicus | 2.61|2.81|3.00, 2 | 3.30|3.30|3.30, 1 | 2.95|2.95|2.95, 1 | 2.17|2.35|2.53, 2 | 3.06|3.25|3.44, 2 | ||||||
P. simplicidens sp. nov. | 2.36|2.36|2.36, 1 | ||||||||||
B. mengensis | 2.20|2.38|2.60, 5 | 0.50|1.18|1.61, 4 | 1.50|1.60|1.73, 4 | 0.58|0.77|0.89, 4 | 1.23|1.27|1.30, 2 | 0.26|0.40|0.53, 2 | |||||
B. chinensis | 2.32|2.54|2.80, 21 | >4.74|>5.35|>6.63, 12 | 1.50|1.51|1.73, 8 | >1.84|>4.15|>4.83, 8 | 1.37|1.47|1.57, 17 | >2.11|>3.08|>3.84, 17 | |||||
B. prechinensis sp. nov. | 2.63|2.63|2.63, 1 | na|≥3.67|na, 1 | 1.60|1.60|1.60, 1 | na|>3.62|na, 1 | 1.84|1.93|2.01, 2 | ||||||
Species | M1 | M2 | M3 | ||||||||
L | PAA-Index | PA-Index | L | PA-Index | L | PA-Index | |||||
M. orientalis (Gaotege) | 2.00|2.38|2.68, 24 | 0.79|1.45|2.09, 24 | 0.78|1.38|2.04, 24 | 1.52|1.87|2.12, 19 | 0.36|0.73|1.10, 19 | 1.64|1.82|2.08, 9 | 0.23|0.36|0.63, 9 | ||||
M. orientalis (Danangou) | 2.24|2.45|2.88, 40 | 1.09|1.51|1.84, 40 | 1.07|1.43|1.78, 40 | 1.72|1.84|2.04, 30 | 0.54|0.86|1.17, 30 | 1.56|1.69|1.88, 9 | 0.26|0.50|0.71, 9 | ||||
M. orientalis (combined) | 2.00|2.42|2.88, 64 | 0.79|1.49|2.09, 64 | 0.78|1.41|2.04, 64 | 1.52|1.85|2.12, 49 | 0.36|0.81|1.17, 49 | 1.56|1.76|2.08, 18 | 0.23|0.43|0.71, 18 | ||||
M. nihewanensis sp. nov. | 1.88|2.45|2.88, 69 | 0.60|1.20|1.84, 69 | 0.72|1.17|1.80, 69 | 1.56|1.90|2.08, 91 | 0.24|0.65|1.20, 91 | 1.52|1.81|2.12, 76 | 0.11|0.39|0.71, 79 | ||||
B. mengensis | 1.90|2.04|2.07, 4 | 0.69|0.90|1.15, 4 | 0.61|0.67|0.89, 4 | 1.73|1.81|1.90, 3 | 0.57|0.67|0.77, 2 | 1.37|1.51|1.83, 8 | 0.37|0.55|0.81, 8 | ||||
B. chinensis | 1.98|2.16|2.37, 20 | >3.23|>5.04|>5.66, 20 | >3.85|>6.05|>6.83, 20 | 1.63|1.79|1.87, 16 | >2.69|>4.90|>6.25, 16 | 1.30|1.46|1.67, 8 | >2.12|>3.75|>4.79, 8 | ||||
B. prechinensis sp. nov. | 2.03|2.10|2.17, 2 | 5.32|5.42|5.52, 2 | 4.57|4.62|4.67, 2 | 1.90|1.90|1.90, 1 | 1.67|1.67|1.67, 1 | 3.03|3.03|3.03, 1 |
Table 2 E, Ea, Eb, HH-Index, PAA-Index, PA-Index, and length of molars of related Mimomys, Borsodia and Pitymys species* of China (min.|mean|max.,n) (mm)
Species | m1 | m2 | m3 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L | E | Ea | Eb | HH-Index | L | HH-Index | L | HH-Index | |||
M. banchiaonicus | 3.90|3.90|3.90, 1 | na|>3.76|na, 1 | |||||||||
M. bilikeensis | 2.26|2.46|2.66, 30 | 0.32|0.70|1.00, 31 | 0.24|0.50|0.76, 31 | 0.08|0.19|0.36, 31 | -0.08|0.10|0.25, 31 | 1.60|1.71|1.84, 16 | -0.04|0.10|0.22, 16 | 1.28|1.44|1.60, 10 | -0.09|-0.16|-0.20, 10 | ||
M. gansunicus | 2.59|2.74|2.92, 15 | na|>3.33|na, 1 | na|>3.20|na, 1 | na>3.17|na,1 | na|>5.18|na, 1 | ||||||
M. orientalis (Gaotege) | 2.44|2.87|3.20, 14 | 2.00|2.52|2.84, 5 | 1.84|2.45|2.72, 5 | 0.96|1.27|1.48, 14 | 0.97|1.27|1.52, 14 | 1.60|1.73|1.92, 12 | 0.75|0.97|1.32, 12 | 1.44|1.53|1.56, 7 | 0.32|0.43|0.54, 7 | ||
M. orientalis (Danangou) | 2.60|2.73|2.88, 26 | 1.00|2.05|2.48, 15 | 1.40|1.87|2.28, 15 | 0.80|1.01|1.24, 15 | 0.78|1.16|1.63, 26 | 1.68|1.78|1.88, 17 | 0.72|0.94|1.40, 17 | 1.40|1.55|1.72, 12 | 0.12|0.37|0.57, 12 | ||
M. orientalis (combined) | 2.44|2.78|3.20, 40 | 1.00|2.17|2.84, 20 | 1.40|2.02|2.72, 20 | 0.80|1.14|1.48, 29 | 0.78|1.20|1.63, 40 | 1.60|1.76|1.92, 29 | 0.72|0.95|1.40, 29 | 1.40|1.54|1.72, 19 | 0.12|0.39|0.57, 19 | ||
M. nihewanensis sp. nov. | 2.44|2.80|3.12, 51 | 1.32|1.81|2.40, 23 | 1.16|1.63|2.20, 23 | 0.08|0.78|1.40, 54 | 0.56|0.81|1.16, 51 | 1.52|1.82|2.12, 61 | 0.14|0.67|1.22, 61 | 1.24|1.58|1.76, 38 | 0.07|0.27|0.57, 38 | ||
M. peii | 3.47|3.64|4.01, 7 | na|>5.30|na,1 | 4.0|4.32|4.63, 2 | 2.25|2.25|2.25, 2 | na|>6.51|na, 2 | ||||||
M. teilhardi | 2.17|2.55|2.85, 102 | 0.40|0.99|1.64, 60 | 0.28|0.92|1.64, 60 | 0.14|0.49|1.12, 60 | 0.20|0.46|1.00, 62 | 1.52|1.71|1.88, 62 | 0.20|0.40|0.65, 62 | 1.28|1.43|1.56, 39 | 0.00|0.12|0.31, 39 | ||
M. youhenicus | 2.61|2.81|3.00, 2 | 3.30|3.30|3.30, 1 | 2.95|2.95|2.95, 1 | 2.17|2.35|2.53, 2 | 3.06|3.25|3.44, 2 | ||||||
P. simplicidens sp. nov. | 2.36|2.36|2.36, 1 | ||||||||||
B. mengensis | 2.20|2.38|2.60, 5 | 0.50|1.18|1.61, 4 | 1.50|1.60|1.73, 4 | 0.58|0.77|0.89, 4 | 1.23|1.27|1.30, 2 | 0.26|0.40|0.53, 2 | |||||
B. chinensis | 2.32|2.54|2.80, 21 | >4.74|>5.35|>6.63, 12 | 1.50|1.51|1.73, 8 | >1.84|>4.15|>4.83, 8 | 1.37|1.47|1.57, 17 | >2.11|>3.08|>3.84, 17 | |||||
B. prechinensis sp. nov. | 2.63|2.63|2.63, 1 | na|≥3.67|na, 1 | 1.60|1.60|1.60, 1 | na|>3.62|na, 1 | 1.84|1.93|2.01, 2 | ||||||
Species | M1 | M2 | M3 | ||||||||
L | PAA-Index | PA-Index | L | PA-Index | L | PA-Index | |||||
M. orientalis (Gaotege) | 2.00|2.38|2.68, 24 | 0.79|1.45|2.09, 24 | 0.78|1.38|2.04, 24 | 1.52|1.87|2.12, 19 | 0.36|0.73|1.10, 19 | 1.64|1.82|2.08, 9 | 0.23|0.36|0.63, 9 | ||||
M. orientalis (Danangou) | 2.24|2.45|2.88, 40 | 1.09|1.51|1.84, 40 | 1.07|1.43|1.78, 40 | 1.72|1.84|2.04, 30 | 0.54|0.86|1.17, 30 | 1.56|1.69|1.88, 9 | 0.26|0.50|0.71, 9 | ||||
M. orientalis (combined) | 2.00|2.42|2.88, 64 | 0.79|1.49|2.09, 64 | 0.78|1.41|2.04, 64 | 1.52|1.85|2.12, 49 | 0.36|0.81|1.17, 49 | 1.56|1.76|2.08, 18 | 0.23|0.43|0.71, 18 | ||||
M. nihewanensis sp. nov. | 1.88|2.45|2.88, 69 | 0.60|1.20|1.84, 69 | 0.72|1.17|1.80, 69 | 1.56|1.90|2.08, 91 | 0.24|0.65|1.20, 91 | 1.52|1.81|2.12, 76 | 0.11|0.39|0.71, 79 | ||||
B. mengensis | 1.90|2.04|2.07, 4 | 0.69|0.90|1.15, 4 | 0.61|0.67|0.89, 4 | 1.73|1.81|1.90, 3 | 0.57|0.67|0.77, 2 | 1.37|1.51|1.83, 8 | 0.37|0.55|0.81, 8 | ||||
B. chinensis | 1.98|2.16|2.37, 20 | >3.23|>5.04|>5.66, 20 | >3.85|>6.05|>6.83, 20 | 1.63|1.79|1.87, 16 | >2.69|>4.90|>6.25, 16 | 1.30|1.46|1.67, 8 | >2.12|>3.75|>4.79, 8 | ||||
B. prechinensis sp. nov. | 2.03|2.10|2.17, 2 | 5.32|5.42|5.52, 2 | 4.57|4.62|4.67, 2 | 1.90|1.90|1.90, 1 | 1.67|1.67|1.67, 1 | 3.03|3.03|3.03, 1 |
Species | Locality | M2 (n|%) | M3 (n|%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-rooted | 2-rooted | 3-rooted | 2-rooted | |||
M. bilikeensis | Bilike | 15|100 | 0|0 | 11|68.8 | 5|31.3 | |
M. teilhardi | Gaotege | 64|100 | 0|0 | 2|5.9 | 32|94.1 | |
M. orientalis | Gaotege | 12|75 | 4|25 | 1|14.3 | 6|85.7 | |
Danangou | 16|61.5 | 10|38.5 | 5|83.3 | 1|16.7 | ||
combined | 28|66.7 | 14|33.3 | 6|46.2 | 7|53.9 | ||
M. nihewanensis sp. nov. | Laowogou etc | 75|96.2 | 3|3.9 | 64|84.2 | 12|15.8 |
Table 3 Proportions of 2- and 3-rooted M2 and M3 in four Mimomys species from China
Species | Locality | M2 (n|%) | M3 (n|%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-rooted | 2-rooted | 3-rooted | 2-rooted | |||
M. bilikeensis | Bilike | 15|100 | 0|0 | 11|68.8 | 5|31.3 | |
M. teilhardi | Gaotege | 64|100 | 0|0 | 2|5.9 | 32|94.1 | |
M. orientalis | Gaotege | 12|75 | 4|25 | 1|14.3 | 6|85.7 | |
Danangou | 16|61.5 | 10|38.5 | 5|83.3 | 1|16.7 | ||
combined | 28|66.7 | 14|33.3 | 6|46.2 | 7|53.9 | ||
M. nihewanensis sp. nov. | Laowogou etc | 75|96.2 | 3|3.9 | 64|84.2 | 12|15.8 |
Fig. 3 Pitymys simplicidens sp. nov. (right m1, GMC V 2056.1, holotype) from Danangou section near Dongyaozitou village, Yuxian County, Hebei Province (After Zheng and Cai, 1991)
Fig. 4 Selected molars of Borsodia prechinensis sp. nov. from Donggou section near Qianjiashawa village, Yangyuan County, Hebei Province A-A2. right m1 (IVPP V 23164.1, holotype), B-B2. right M1 (V 23164.4), C-C2. left M3 (V 23164.6),D-D2. right m3 (V 23164.3); A-D. occlusal view, A1-D1. buccal view, A2-D2. lingual view
Fig. 5 Right m1 (IVPP V 15475, holotype) of Pliosiphneus daodiensis sp. nov. from Laowogou section near Daodi village, Yangyuan County, Hebei Province A. occlusal view, A1. lingual view, A2. buccal view
Fig. 6 Selected molars of Pliosiphneus puluensis sp. nov. from Yushe Basin, Shanxi Province (A) and Niutoushan section near Pulu village, Yuxian County, Hebei Province (B-C) A-A1. right M1-3 (IVPP RV 42025),B-B1. left m1 (V 15476, holotype),C-C1. right m2 (V 15476.2); A-C. occlusal view, A1. buccal view, B1-C1. lingual view
[1] | Cai B Q, Zhang Z Q, Zheng S H et al., 2004. New advances in the stratigraphic study on representative sections in the Nihewan Basin, Hebei. Prof Pap Stratigr Paleont, 28:267-285 |
[2] | Cai B Q, Zheng S H, Li Q, 2007. Plio-Pleistocene small mammals from the Niutoushan Section of the Yuxian Basin, China. Vert PalAsiat, 45(3):232-245 |
[3] | Cai B Q, Zheng S H, Liddicoat J C et al., 2013. Review of the Litho-, Bio-, and Chronostratigraphy in the Nihewan Basin, Heibei, China. In: Wang X M, Flynn L J, Fortelius M eds. Fossil Mammals of Asia-Neogene Biostratigraphy and Chronology. New York: Columbia University Press. 218-242 |
[4] | Carls N, Rabeder G, 1988. Arvicolids (Rodentia, Mammalia) from the earliest Pleistocene of Schernfeld (Bavaria). Beitr Paläontol Österr, 14:123-238 |
[5] | Heinrich W D, 1990. Some aspects of evolution and biostratigraphy of Arvicola (Mammalia, Rodentia) in the central European Pleistocene. In: Fejfar O, Heinrich W D eds. International Symposium Evolution, Phylogeny and Biostratigraphy of Arvicolids (Rodentia, Mammalia). Prague: Geological Survey. 165-182 |
[6] | Kawamura Y, 1988. Quaternary rodent faunas in the Japanese Islands (Part I). Mem Fac Sci, Kyoto Univ Ser Geol Mineral, 53:31-348 |
[7] | Li Q, Zheng S H, Cai B Q, 2008. Pliocene biostratigraphic sequence in the Nihewan Basin, Hebei, China. Vert PalAsiat, 46(3):210-232 |
[8] | Liu L P, Zheng S H, Cui N et al., 2014. Rootless myopspalacines from Upper Pliocene to Lower Pleistocene of Wenwanggou section, Lingtai, Gansu. Vert PalAsiat, 52(4):440-466 |
[9] | Luo Z X, Chen W, Gao W et al., 2000. Fauna Sinica, Mammalia Vol 6 Rodentia III: Cricetidae. Beijing: Science Press. 1-514 |
[10] | Min L R, Zhang Z H, Wang X S et al., 2006. The basal boundary of the Nihewan Formation at the Tai’ergou section of Yangyuan, Hebei Province. J Stratigr, 30(2):103-108 |
[11] | Qiu Z D, Li Q, 2016. Neogene rodents from central Nei Mongol, China. Palaeontol Sin, New Ser C, 30:1-684 |
[12] |
Qiu Z D, Storch G, 2000. The Early Pliocene micromammalian fauna of Bilike, Inner Mongolia, China (Mammalia: Lipotyphla, Chiroptera, Rodentia, Lagomorpha). Senckenbergiana lethaea, 80(1):173-229
DOI URL |
[13] | Tesakov A S, 2004. Biostratigraphy of Middle Pliocene-Eospleistocene of Eastern Europe (Based on Small Mammals). Moscow: Nauka. 1-247 |
[14] | van de Weerd A, 1976. Rodent faunas of the Mio-Pliocene continental sediments of the Teruel-Alfambra region, Spain. Utrecht Micropal Bull Spec Publ, 2:1-216 |
[15] | Yang Z G, Lin H M, 1996. Quaternary Strata of China and International Correlation. Beijing: Geological Publishing House. 1-207 |
[16] | Yuan B Y, Zhu R X, Tian W L et al., 1996. On the age, stratigraphy and comparison of the Nihewan Formation. Sci China- Ser D, 26(1):67-73 |
[17] | Zhang Y Q, 2017. Fossil Arvicolini of Yushe Basin: facts and problems of arvicoline biochronology of North China. In: Flynn L J, Wu W Y eds. Late Cenozoic Yushe Basin, Shanxi Province, China: Geology and Fossil Mammals. Vol II: Small Mammal Fossils of Yushe Basin. Dordrecht: Springer, 153-172 |
[18] |
Zhang Y Q, Zheng S H, Wei G B, 2011. Fossil arvicolines from the Leijiahe section, Lingtai, Gansu Province and current progress of Chinese arvicoline biochronology. Quat Sci, 31(4):622-635
DOI URL |
[19] | Zhang Z Q, Zheng S H, Liu J B, 2003. Pliocene micromammalian biostratigraphy of Nihewan Basin, with comments on the stratigraphic division. Vert Palasiat, 41(4):306-313 |
[20] | Zheng S H, 1994. Classification and evolution of the Siphneidae. In: Tomida Y, Li C K, Setoguchi T eds. Rodent and Lagomorph Families of Asian Origins and Diversification. Nat Sci Mus Monogr, 8:57-76 |
[21] | Zheng S H, 2017. The zokors of Yushe Basin. In: Flynn L J, Wu W Y eds. Late Cenozoic Yushe Basin, Shanxi Province, China: Geology and Fossil Mammals. Vol II: Small Mammal Fossils of Yushe Basin. Dordrecht: Springer. 89-121 |
[22] | Zheng S H, Cai B Q, 1991. Fossil micromammals from the Donggou Section of Dongyazitou, Yuxian, Hebei. In: IVPP ed. Contributions to the INQUA XIII. Beijing: Beijing Science and Technology Publishing House, 100-131 |
[23] | Zheng S H, Li C K, 1986. A review of Chinese Mimomys (Arvicolidae, Rodentia). Vert PalAsiat, 24(2):81-109 |
[24] | Zheng S H, Zhang Z Q, 2000. Late Miocene-Early Pleistocene micromammals from Wenwanggou of Lingtai, Gansu, China. Vert PalAsiat, 38(1):58-71 |
[25] | Zheng S H, Zhang Z Q, 2001. Late Miocene-Early Pleistocene biostratigraphy of the Leijiahe Area, Lingtai, Gansu. Vert PalAsiat, 39(3):215-228 |
[26] | Zheng S H, Cai B Q, Li Q, 2006. The Plio-Pleistocene small mammals from Donggou section of Nihewan Basin, Hebei, China. Vert PalAsiat, 44(4):320-331 |
[27] |
Zhu R X, Hoffman K A, Potts R et al., 2001. Earliest presence of humans in northeast Asia. Nature, 413:413-417
PMID |
[1] | 王伴月. 副竹鼠(拟速掘鼠亚科,鼠超科)一新种在甘肃临夏盆地的发现. 古脊椎动物学报, 2022, 60(4): 271-277. |
[2] | Henry GALIANO, 曾志杰, Nikos SOLOUNIAS, 王晓鸣, 邱占祥, Stuart C. WHITE. 甘肃临夏盆地中新世鬣狗科一新属新种. 古脊椎动物学报, 2022, 60(2): 81-116. |
[3] | 肖博, 盛桂莲, 袁俊霞, 王斯人, 胡家铭, 陈顺港, 姬海龙, 侯新东, 赖旭龙. 中国东北鹿亚科动物亚化石的古DNA分子鉴定及系统发育分析. 古脊椎动物学报, 2020, 58(4): 328-337. |
[4] | DUCROCQ Stéphane. 泰国晚始新世Anthracokeryx thailandicus Ducrocq, 1999(石炭兽科,小丘齿兽亚科)的分类修订. 古脊椎动物学报, 2020, 58(4): 293-304. |
[5] | 王伴月, 邱占祥, 李绿洲. 甘肃和政晚中新世许氏鼠(啮齿类:鼠科)头骨化石. 古脊椎动物学报, 2020, 58(2): 120-133. |
[6] | 侯素宽, 邓涛. 甘肃临夏盆地库班猪属(猪科,偶蹄目)一新种. 古脊椎动物学报, 2019, 57(2): 155-172. |
[7] | 徐 星,李 峰. 小盗龙亚科(兽脚亚目:驰龙科)一新标本及简评复合骨在兽脚亚目中的演化. 古脊椎动物学报, 2016, 54(4): 269-285. |
[8] | 王晓鸣,王洪江,江左其杲 . 内蒙古敖尔班地区早中新世犬熊类的新记录. 古脊椎动物学报, 2016, 54(1): 21-35. |
[9] | 李刈昆 . 甘肃龙担早更新世丽牛下颌骨新材料及其对虎亚科捕食策略的证据——龙担哺乳动物群补充报道之四. 古脊椎动物学报, 2015, 53(3): 193-205. |
[10] | 卢小康,吉学平, 高 峰,李刈昆,段 梅. 元谋盆地晚中新世古猿动物群元谋无鼻角犀新材料. 古脊椎动物学报, 2014, 52(4): 427-439. |
[11] | 薛祥煦, 邓 涛, Margery C. COOMBS,张云翔. 陕西府谷发现的晚中新世爪兽新材料. 古脊椎动物学报, 2014, 52(4): 401-426. |
[12] | 刘丽萍, 郑绍华,崔 宁, 王李花. 记甘肃灵台晚上新世-早更新世地层中的无根鼢鼠. 古脊椎动物学报, 2014, 52(4): 440-466. |
[13] | 杨精涛,尤海鲁,李大庆,孔得来 . 多刺甲龙亚科恐龙在亚洲的首次发现. 古脊椎动物学报, 2013, 51(4): 265-277. |
[14] | 吴文裕,倪喜军,叶 捷,孟 津,毕顺东. 新疆准噶尔盆地北缘中中新世早期的原圆齿鼠(Promylagaulinae, Mylagaulidae). 古脊椎动物学报, 2013, 51(1): 55-70. |
[15] | 邢 海,Albert PRIETO-MáRQUEZ, 顾 伟,于廷相. 中国东北马斯特里赫特阶的Wulagasaurus dongi (鸭嘴龙亚科)的重新评估与系统发育分析. 古脊椎动物学报, 2012, 50(2): 160-169. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||